

dystopika continues:
I understand that some people (many people?) actually call to complain to the cable companies when the picture DOESN'T stretch out to the sides. They're somehow blind to the distortion that happens in Stretch-o-Vision, and they prefer it to OAR.
But if the cable-company argument is that they're trying to appeal to the broadest (lowest) common denominator, I don't get why the major networks can manage to avoid the Stretch-O-Vision deal. The Hallmark Channel HD even uses side-bars to show their older movies-of-the-week.
I've watched a bit more of the Food Network HD and the newer, genuine HD content looks good. But even their own network promos are still in stretcho. You'd think they'd've created a few FN HD graphics to launch the channel.
It's like how friggin Showtime HD reverts to stretcho in between programs...
2 comments:
This is so annoying it's amazing that they're still doing it.
Ack... THIS DRIVES ME NUTS? I don't understand how anyone can look at what they do (it's present in just about all of their HD programming as well) to the picture and think to themselves "yeah, this is a really good idea". It boggles the mind.
I don't think it's a simple case of stretching a 4:3 aspect ratio to fit in a 16:9 aspect ratio aperture. I think they're actually using some kind of algorithm to process the video that ATTEMPTS to apply a minimal amount of distortion to the center of the image and apply more stretching to the end of the image. The result is that it looks like they're using some kind of VERY POORLY manufactured lens which hasn't been properly corrected. UGH!
Make it stop!
Cheers, Joe
Post a Comment